图片新闻Photo:Nordic Furniture and Light Exhibition concludes

北欧绿色邮报网报道(记者陈雪霏)--一年一度为期五天的北欧家居灯具展13日在斯德哥尔摩落下帷幕。请欣赏北欧设计的魅力。

DSC_7004

DSC_7003

DSC_7002

DSC_7001

精美的造型

DSC_7000

DSC_6999

 

DSC_6997

DSC_6996

DSC_6995

DSC_6993

DSC_6992

DSC_6991

DSC_6990

DSC_6989

DSC_6987

DSC_6986

DSC_6984

最欣赏这款。希望能挂在自己家里。

DSC_6983

DSC_6982

DSC_6980

DSC_6979

DSC_6977

DSC_6976

DSC_6974

DSC_6972

DSC_6971

DSC_6970

DSC_6969

DSC_6968

芬兰公司也来这里参展。他表示,来这里参展见到了20多个国家的同行。

DSC_6966

DSC_6965

DSC_6964

DSC_6963

大理石音响真是让人耳目一新啊!

DSC_6961

DSC_6960

DSC_6959

DSC_6957

DSC_6954

DSC_6953

DSC_6951

 

DSC_6949

DSC_6947

DSC_6945

DSC_6943

DSC_6942

DSC_6941

DSC_6940

DSC_6938

DSC_6937

DSC_6936

DSC_6935

DSC_6934

DSC_6933

DSC_6932

DSC_6930

DSC_6928

DSC_6927

DSC_6926

DSC_6925

DSC_6924

DSC_6921

DSC_6920

DSC_6918

DSC_6917

DSC_6915

DSC_6913

DSC_6911

DSC_6910

DSC_6909

DSC_6908

DSC_6906

DSC_6905

 

DSC_6920

DSC_6918

DSC_6917

DSC_6915

DSC_6907

DSC_6905

DSC_6904

DSC_6901

DSC_6900

DSC_6899

DSC_6898

DSC_6895

DSC_6894

DSC_6892

DSC_6891

DSC_6890

DSC_6889

DSC_6888

DSC_6887

DSC_6886

DSC_6885

DSC_6884

DSC_6882

DSC_6881

今日要闻: 卡罗林斯卡医学院校长被批“有事实证据但还是让外科医生继续”

北欧绿色邮报网13日报道(记者陈雪霏)——揭示马基亚里尼事件的电视纪录片制片人布瑟.林德奎斯特9日在瑞典主流报纸每日新闻DN辩论栏目上发表署名文章《KI校长有事实证据但还是让外科医生继续》。

k2

林德奎斯特写到:上周,卡罗林斯卡医学院(KI)理事会给大学校长安德斯.哈马斯坦全信任。不是问责学术造假,而是要进行避开所有医学知识问题的调查。卡罗林斯卡领导层似乎走错了路。

 

文章说:外科医生保罗.马基亚里尼的造假丑闻是人们怎么能在光天化日之下撒谎的例证。但是,这也是瑞典两个著名的机构领导层试图隐瞒严重错误的文化史,对那些大胆发出警告的人企图息事宁人。

 

最终是这个问题将威胁瑞典医院和科研的名声。

 

“我跟踪这个在病人身上移植并未发挥作用的塑料气管的外科医生保罗.马基亚里尼一年多。我比较评估他的学术文章。我见了他的同事,病人和家属。我做了一个拼图表明病人的生命是有意面临风险的,学术造假大行其道。瑞典医院在给人做实验之前,没有在老鼠身上做试验。当我面对卡罗林斯卡医学院和卡罗林斯卡大学医院领导层的时候,我遇到的是不愿意调查到底发生了什么——就象两年前,那些发出警告的医生们遇到的情况一样。”

 

卡罗林斯卡医学院没有做应该做的,反而放出新的烟雾。人们继续忽视四名医院医生发现的科研造假的很多证据, 这在瑞典电视台的纪录片“实验”里有描述。

 

根据KI领导层,最大的问题是马基亚里尼在国外的工作——在俄罗斯进行的手术。他们宣称人们不知道在那里发生了什么。

 

但真实情况是,计划在俄罗斯做手术之前的2013年春,在瑞典的一次手术已经失败。医务主任伍尔夫.罗考完特在一封邮件中决定停止马基亚里尼进行手术,原因是复杂的副作用,然而,医院却没有停止。

 

也是这个领导层企图隐瞒真相。不是公开改正错误,停止一切未来的手术,而是选择仿佛什么都没有发生一样。

 

哈姆斯坦2014年1月延长马基亚里尼客座教授合同,使他能继续做手术。但手术都是在国外做的。例如在俄罗斯一个舞蹈演员做了气管移植手术,后来去世。

 

另外,马基亚里尼2012年在老鼠身上第一次试验移植塑料气管时,他已经在四,五个人身上进行了人工合成气管移植手术。

 

四名卡罗林斯卡医学院医生在2014年初向哈姆斯坦报告整个试验项目都不仅导致死亡,而且都是在做假。结果哈姆斯坦回答说,这有什么问题?他可以在别的地方手术,如果他要继续做手术。

 

只要马基亚里尼在俄罗斯做这样危险的试验,哈姆斯坦和KI就选择睁一只眼闭一只眼。

 

但是,那些汇报的医生没有放弃。2014年9月,一份400页的报告呈递到哈姆斯坦的办公桌上。八个月之后,2015年5月,哈姆斯坦找独立评估者叶丁教授评估,结论是马基亚里尼的研究没有反应事实。但是,哈姆斯坦在8月份依然放过了马基亚里尼。

 

2016年1月瑞典电视台播放了纪录片,显示病人是如何慢慢地窒息至死,只因移植了马基亚里尼的塑料气管。但卡罗林斯卡医学院继续否认真相。哈姆斯坦说院方不知道在俄罗斯招人手术的事。

 

上周四,院方还给哈姆斯坦全信任票。不但不调查学术造假,而且还搞一个完全避免学术问题的调查。

 

卡罗林斯卡医学院的领导层生活在自己的象牙塔中。他们不顾六条生命的死亡可能就是因为这个危险的医学实验。

 

在瑞典手术后还活着的病人必须煎熬着每四个小时就要清洗一次他的人工合成气管,以避免窒息死亡。人们来卡罗林斯卡做手术是慕名而来。然而,这个方法却是马基亚里尼自己计划在一年内使用新的气管在人身上试验。

 

文章要求必须彻底调查卡罗林斯卡的学术造假和人体试验事件,否则,损害的不仅仅是卡罗林斯卡医学院在瑞典乃至国际上的声誉,而且还有新病人的生命。

 

林德奎斯特的三集电视纪录片描述了病人的痛苦,以及他们是如何被劝说做这个手术的。做这个手术的7人中六人都已经死去,而且比他们预期死的早。

 

马基亚里尼不承认病人是因为这个死亡的。但他也承认这个有问题。

 

12日,哈姆斯坦宣布辞职。承认自己负有责任。

今日头条:诺奖得主卡尔松认为马基亚里尼事件对诺贝尔医学奖产生负面影响

今日头条:瑞典媒体调查导致卡罗林斯卡医学院领导层“地震”

北欧绿色邮报网报道(记者陈雪霏)——瑞典媒体调查导致卡罗林斯卡医学院(KI)领导层“地震”。医学院副院长安德斯.哈姆斯坦12日宣布辞职。

anders_puff

安德斯.哈姆斯坦。                KI网站照片。

他说,“我没能看到警告信号。公众,学术界,教职员工和学生对我这个副院长的信心受到了损害。我再在瑞典可信度和有效性最成功的大学里继续担任副校长是很难的。因此,我将辞职。”

哈姆斯坦的辞职信发表在瑞典主流媒体每日新闻DN的辩论栏目里。

这是对此前发表在辩论栏目里的两篇重要文章的回应。 2月9日,三集电视新闻调查的制片人布瑟.林德奎斯特写文章说,因为院长早就知道事实,却一直没有采取措施,所以,他有责任。

2月11日,斯德哥尔摩大学哲学教授托比恩.谭霍在DN辩论栏目发表文章,继续谈KI的问题。文章开篇就说,如果有人必须因为马基亚里尼事件辞职的话,那就是院长安德斯.哈姆斯坦。文章题目是“卡罗林斯卡医学院与诺贝尔奖混为一谈,缺乏学术氛围”。

谭霍认为卡罗林斯卡医学院需要激进的转变,只换一个院长都不够,问题出在缺少学术氛围。文章指出卡罗林斯卡医学院领导层对教授头衔的授予把关不严。有些人就因为和院长关系好就容易获得教授头衔。(文章详细内容,请继续阅读北欧绿色邮报网)

哈姆斯坦在辞呈中写自己是副院长,这是因为历史上瑞典国王是院长,真正的院长就叫副院长。

哈姆斯坦说:“马基亚里尼事件”或者说“卡罗林斯卡医学院丑闻”在过去几个星期动摇了人们对卡罗林斯卡医学院和医学研究的信心。我有理由审视我的行为和我做的关于对医学研究不规范进行调查的决定。该决定起源于过去两周的媒体风暴。

由于媒体的关注,卡罗林斯卡医学院接到新的信息,注定给调查马基亚里尼事件另一种画面。我的结论是卡罗林斯卡医学院必须对马基亚里尼的科研不正当行为展开调查。在这样的背景下,似乎我(在八月份)对这个案例的决定是错误的。

过去几天(的信息披露),很显然在调查事件时,卡罗林斯卡医学院(KI)掌握的信息是不完整的。上周三,我们对马基亚里尼在基于他的第一次为冰岛病人做手术的基础上写的论文产生新的印象。过去几天里,卡罗林斯卡医学院也接到信息暗示在老鼠身上做人工合成气管实验的文章有严重的不准确性。

imagesk1

卡罗林斯卡新大楼。   网络图片。

这一信息对KI来说是全新的。我们正努力彻底调查这个信息,并安排独立审查。但是,很多迹象表明去年夏天KI的判断应该修改为学术不正当,说白了就是学术造假。

后来我得出结论,我本应该在2015年8月就得出这样的结论。我们应该更全面一些,作为KI副院长,我最终对此负有责任。

布瑟.林德奎斯特做了一部重要的纪录片,把很多重要的问题拼到一起,揭示了卡罗林斯卡医学院的错误判断。

今天,我才意识到我完全错误地评判了马基亚里尼,他和卡罗林斯卡医学院早就应该分开。很有可能2010年雇用他就是错误的。两年之后,我开始担任副院长职务。

KI没有及早看到警告迹象,也没太注意来自那些和马基亚里尼紧密工作的医生们的警告。KI也没有对马基亚里尼使用人工合成气管的方法采取足够的批评态度。很多人说,我,作为医学院副院长,和卡罗林斯卡大学医院的管理层在马基亚里尼在俄罗斯做研究项目时就应该引起足够注意。

事后想来,我当然能看出来我们确实应该这么做。但是,人们必须记住,马基亚里尼在俄罗斯Krasnodar医院做的临床研究是得到俄罗斯当局允许的。根据KI获得的信息,每个个体病人都给予了伦理上的许可。这些许可采取了什么样的形式,病人在手术前是什么样的医疗状态,这一点只有那些参与研究的人知道。很明显,病人保密的原则在俄罗斯也存在。在最近的讨论中,卡罗林斯卡医学院也被批评其自给自足的文化氛围,非健康的精英主义和名利思想。这可能是真的,但我不知道。但是,真实的情况是我们对努力用科研和教育改善人类健康,为使瑞典整个社会都受益而鼓励在生命科学领域进行医疗突破和创新抱有很高的理想。

成千上万的非常出类拔萃的有能力又尽职尽责的员工在KI和卡罗林斯卡大学医学院工作。他们与这个不幸的事故无关。所有这些忠诚的尽职尽责的员工值得我们感激,支持和鼓励。

很明显,很多人对卡罗林斯卡医学院自给自足的精英大学的印象值得警醒。现在我们必须放下架子,追根问底地讨论是否这里有非健康的学术氛围。

KI正在审查其招募和雇佣的过程以及我们的控制机制。我们必须以更好的方式来引进和照顾国际研究人员。我们必须更明确地和雇员讲清楚他们在瑞典和在国外的规范行为伦理框架。

k2卡罗林斯卡医学院的名誉被马基亚里尼事件损害的事实是非常严重的,很明显我是负有责任的。KI理事会已经开始对KI处理马基亚里尼事件进行调查,其过程包括雇佣过程,和我下令调查学术造假等一系列过程。

另一个类似的关于卡罗林斯卡医学院医院的作用问题的外部调查也在进行。

这太好了,因为两项独立调查将直接为犯下的错误提供答案,让人们从中吸取教训。

我意识到人们对我担任副院长一职的信心受到了损害,不但在公众那里,在学术界和KI员工学生那里也一样。要求我辞职的呼声是多方面的,这使我意识到如果我继续在这个可信度和有效性在瑞典都非常成功的大学继续担任副院长是很困难的。因此,我将辞去我的职务。

以上是哈马斯坦的辞职信。

瑞典电视台1月28日播出三集电视纪录片《试验》,制片人林德奎斯特跟踪马基亚里尼一年多时间。从纪录片看出,他在冰岛的病人,美国的病人,俄罗斯的病人和其他三位病人在使用人工合成气管后不久都去世了。马基亚里尼手术之后,立即召开新闻发布会,称手术成功。但在瑞典电视台的新闻调查中发现,过后,这些人都死的比预期的早。

另外,美国《名利场》杂志也刊登了马基亚里尼与美国NBC电视记者的桃色事件,表明马基亚里尼善于夸大其词,让KI的中国学者说就是大忽悠,或者叫职业忽悠。

这两组报道出来后,卡罗林斯卡医学院诺奖大会秘书长遗传基因学教授乌尔班.伦达尔7日宣布辞职。据报道,他可能与马基亚里尼的雇佣有关。瑞典电台报道说,虽然他没有受到任何指控犯什么错误,但他说他决定辞职有利于对事件的调查。

当时,卡罗林斯卡医学院理事会还表示对哈姆斯坦抱有信心。但一周之后,他也宣布辞职了。

卡罗林斯卡医学院是1810年成立的,当时就是为救治战争中受伤的伤员而建立的野战医院。当时有一部分房屋就坐落在记者家附近的瓦萨公园旁边的敬老院里。今天用作敬老院了。后来,瑞典逐渐发展医疗研究,从实战临床医院,转变到医学研究院。2010年,卡罗林斯卡医学院庆祝成立200周年纪念。就在那一年雇用了意大利裔瑞士出生的马基亚里尼教授。历史发展是否有时就是这样有趣呢!

根据新闻调查,马基亚里尼的简历和所谓教授头衔似乎都有不准确或夸大的嫌疑。到底是不是这样呢?让我们等待调查结果。

1901年卡罗林斯卡医学院开始承担评比诺贝尔生理学或医学奖的任务。116年来,卡罗林斯卡医学院也因为诺贝尔奖而闻名世界。

关于林德奎斯特的文章,北欧绿色邮报网将继续为您报道。

卡罗林斯卡医学院被批“与诺贝尔奖混淆缺乏学术氛围”

 

Hamsten resigns as chancellor of Karolinska Institute

By Xuefei Chen Axelsson

STOCKHOLM, Feb. 13(Greenpost)–Anders  Hamsten, Vice Chancellor of Karolinska Institute announced on Friday that he would resign due to the Italian visiting professor Macchiarini’s case.

“I failed to see the warning signs. Confidence in me as Vice-Chancellor of KI has been impaired both among the public, the research community and KI’s staff and students. It will be difficult for me to continue to act as Vice-Chancellor of Sweden’s most successful university with credibility and effectiveness. For that reason I am resigning my post, “Anders Hamsten writes.

imagesk1Hamsten’s resignation came after SVT series investigation report on Macchiarini’s experiment of plastic windpipe applied in human being causing deaths of the patients.

This was seen as a strong” earthquake “for Karolinska Institute because late last week Urban Lendahl resigned.

Swedish mainstream newspaper Daily News or DN published a series of debate articles criticising him of knowing the facts, but not doing the intervention earlier.  The other article criticised Karolinska Institute of mixing Nobel Prize in Medicine and academic research, saying the control of professorship was not academic. In other words relationship with the leadership played an important role.

The articles also pointed out that the responsibilities of Karolinska Institute and the Karolinska Institute hospital are somewhat confusing.

After these two articles published, Hamsten decided to resign “because KI has received new information which gives a modified picture of the charges of irregularity against Paolo Macchiarini. ”

He has already decided that an external investigation will be conducted and former president of Swedish Administration Court of Appeal was appointed to do the job.

On Feb. 7  genetics professor Urban Lendahl, who sat on two prestigious Nobel groups, announced his resignation from those positions after it became clear he may be involved in an external investigation regarding the once-prominent surgeon Paolo Macchiarini, according to Swedish Radio.

On Saturday, Lendahl decided to step down as secretary general of the Nobel Assembly and the Nobel Committee in Physiology or Medicine at Stockholm’s Karolinska Institute.

The Karolinska Institute University Board said it launched an external investigation into the hiring and work of Macchiarini who is a visiting professor at the facility.

Macchiarini had performed experimental transplants involving plastic windpipes coated with the patient’s stem cells and has been accused by several colleagues of overstating his outcomes and the effectiveness of the procedures.

Last  Friday, Macchiarini was notified by the Institute’s vice chancellor that his contract would not be extended.

Lendahl has not be accused of any wrongdoing but thought it best to step aside while the investigation was ongoing.

“As professor Lendahl anticipates that he may be involved in this investigation, he resigns from his position as Secretary General out of respect for the integrity of the Nobel Prize work,” read a news release from the professor Rune Toftgård, chairman of the Nobel Assembly.

The assembly is an independent body of 50 professors from the Karolinska Institute which awards the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine.

Hamsten published his resignation in the DN debate.

The following is the whole text.

The ”Macchiarini affair” or the ”KI scandal” has substantially shaken confidence in medical research in general and in Karolinska Institutet in particular during the last few weeks. I have had reason to scrutinise both my actions and the decisions I have made concerning the investigation into research irregularities that was the starting point for the media storm which has been raging for the last couple of weeks.

Because of the attention in the media, KI has received new information which definitely gives a modified picture of the charges of irregularity against Paolo Macchiarini. My conclusion is that KI’s investigation into Paolo Macchiarini’s scientific misconduct has to be reopened. Against this backdrop it seems very likely that my decision in this case was wrong.

During the last few days it has become obvious that the information possessed by KI when the matter was investigated was not complete. Last Wednesday we were given a new impression of the period following the operation in Iceland on his first patient, whose case is the basis of some of Macchiarini’s articles. During the last few days KI has also received information that implies serious inaccuracies in an article describing trials with artificial tracheae in rats. This information was totally new for KI. We are now endeavouring to investigate this information thoroughly and arrange an independent examination. But there is much to indicate that the judgement reached by KI last summer should be amended to scientific misconduct, which in plain language means research fraud.

In hindsight I can conclude that I should have looked for these probable inaccuracies during the review that led to the decision KI made on the matter of misconduct in August 2015. We should quite simply have been more thorough. As Vice-Chancellor of KI I am ultimately responsible for this.

Bosse Lindquist has made an important documentary series which pinpoints a number of important questions and reveals misjudgements at Karolinska Institutet. Today I can see that I completely misjudged Paolo Macchiarini and that he and KI should have gone their separate ways far earlier. It was in all probability wrong to employ him in 2010, just over two years before I was appointed Vice-Chancellor.

KI failed to see the warning signs early enough and did not pay enough attention to the warnings that came from doctors working close to Paolo Macchiarini. Nor was KI critical enough of the method of using artificial tracheae that Macchiarini adopted. Many have said that I, as Vice Chancellor, together with the management of Karolinska University Hospital should have acted to draw these warnings to the attention of the research project Paolo Macchiarini was conducting in Russia. With the benefit of hindsight I can of course see that we should have done so. At the same time, one has to remember that the clinical study Macchiarini conducted in Krasnodar was undertaken with permission from the Russian authorities and that, according to information available to KI, there was ethical approval for each single patient. What form these approvals took and what the medical status of the patients was before the operations is known only by those who took part in the study. Patient confidentiality, obviously, also exists in Russia.

In the recent discussion Karolinska Institutet has also been criticised for a culture of self-sufficiency, unhealthy elitism and prestige thinking. This may be true, I don’t know. What is, however, true is that we have high ambitions in our endeavour to use research and education to improve people’s health and at the same time contribute to medical breakthroughs and innovation in the field of life sciences which will benefit the whole of society in Sweden.

Tens of thousands of extraordinarily capable and dedicated employees who have had nothing at all to do with this unfortunate story work at KI and Karolinska University Hospital. All these loyal and dedicated employees deserve our gratitude, support and encouragement.

It is obvious that the picture many people have of KI as a self-sufficient elite university is alarming. Now we must ransack ourselves and get to the bottom of the question of whether an unhealthy academic culture prevails here. KI is reviewing the routines concerning recruitment and employment as well as our control mechanisms. We must introduce and take care of international researchers in a better way. And we must be more explicit with our employees about the ethical framework that is in place for their actions in Sweden as well as abroad. KI will actively encourage dialogue and discussions about values so that they are always inherent in our work.

The fact that Karolinska Institutet’s reputation has been tarnished by the ”Macchiarini affair” is extremely serious and is something for which I am obviously responsible. KI’s board has initiated an investigation into KI’s handling of Paolo Macchiarini from recruitment onwards and, not least, my actions in the misconduct investigation. A similar external investigation of Karolinska University Hospital’s role is being undertaken. This is excellent, as the two autonomous investigations will provide answers about direct errors that have been committed and what can be learned from them.

I am aware that confidence in me as Vice-Chancellor of KI has been impaired, both in the public, the research community and many of KI’s employees and students. The chorus of voices raised to demand my resignation is so multifarious and strident that I realise it will be difficult for me to continue working as Vice Chancellor of Sweden’s most successful university with credibility and effectiveness. That is why I am resigning my position.

http://www.dn.se/debatt/i-am-resigning-my-position-as-vice-chancellor-of-karolinska-institutet/

http://ki.se/en/news/anders-hamsten-steps-down-as-vice-chancellor-of-karolinska-institutet